Faculty personnel actions are guided by Collectively Negotiated Agreements, which can be found on the HR website. Several agreements (state and local) and additional MOAs govern these processes, and all reviewers – faculty committees, faculty leaders (chairs, associate directors of faculty, and school directors) are responsible for understanding and following these procedures and additional guidance or directives that may be embedded in department or school by-laws.
Each college/school dean has an appointed person – typically an associate dean – who is the first person that reviewers should consult when they have a question regarding procedures. When that person needs further guidance, they will seek out support from the Assistant Vice President for Personnel Services, Mary Colon (procedures, contract questions, questions about the Interfolio platform), and the Associate Provost for Faculty Affairs, Emily Isaacs (questions about the review process, evaluation, or protocol).
Faculty personnel review requires utmost professionalism, conscientiousness, and confidentiality, and thus, reviewers at every level should seek out opportunities to develop and hone their skills in this area.
Reviewer Resources
- The relevant workshops, slides, and materials are located in other sections of this page as they directly relate to particular processes (i.e., TF reappointment, TT tenure, etc.)
- The criteria for promotion are outlined in Faculty Roles and Expectations. Criteria for Evaluation of Full-Time Librarians are listed in the March 2025 external letters settlement agreement.
- Workshops and Information sessions at the OFE Workshop system.
- Look out for live informational sessions in the system or access archived workshops.
- Reviewers should be familiar with the guidance provided by OFE and other offices as it relates to teaching, research, and service development, detailed in previous sections.
- All university full-time faculty are expected to participate in the important work of peer observation of teaching, whether it’s review of adjunct faculty, TT faculty, or TF up for reappointment. Providing a cogent teaching observation that provides the reviewed faculty member with concrete information to support their continued development, as well as judgment, requires skill and practice, and is much aided by thoughtful consideration and discussion among colleagues. These resources should also be helpful
- Any college, school, or department created templates, or guides
- OFE Peer Observations advisory and templates