Candidate conducts a review of the literature related to a particular topic in mathematics education and then synthesizes that review to produce a critical analysis of the relevant literature. The candidate should choose a topic related to their potential dissertation topic. Although the work prepared for the literature review may become the basis of the candidate’s dissertation, it should be distinguished from the proposal stage, where the candidate presents their research questions and research design. The candidate is encouraged to conclude their literature review by highlighting gaps in the extant literature and using the literature to propose future directions of research in the area.
The literature review must explicitly address the following overarching questions:
- What theories and methodologies have researchers used to study your topic? How have these theories evolved through the history of mathematics education? Are these theories compatible or incompatible?
- What are the seminal works? What are key findings from these and other papers on the topic and how have researchers used these findings to further study the topic? If key findings have not supported further research describe possible reasons for this.
- What are the gaps in the current literature and areas for further study?
Notes and Resources:
- For all stages of the dissertation, candidates are encouraged to expect at least two weeks for faculty members to provide feedback.
- When all committee members agree that the literature review is ready to discuss, set a date for a formal discussion with the committee.
- The MSU Library has a Research Guide about Literature Reviews. The University of Minnesota’s Library has a web-based tutorial, as well.
- The Graduate School provides resources for writing your dissertation. We recommend that you write your proposal using a dissertation template and a citation manager.